Quick look at a bit of coolness from yesterday’s presser, then onward into the fray–
Buckeye news
Ohio State announced yesterday that they will be wearing customized helmets for the Spring Game, painted with a military design to honor American servicemen and commemorate the 75th anniversary Jesse Owen’s performance at the Berlin Games.
Most of these helmets will be re-painted over the summer, but the announcement goes on to read
Each of the 25 remaining “camo” helmets will be individually numbered, autographed by Ohio State head football coach Jim Tressel and then sold, with the sale benefiting the Ohio National Guard Family Readiness and Warrior Support Program, LiFE (Learning in Fitness & Education) through Sports Program and the Ruth and Jesse Owens Scholars Fund. These helmets will be sold off-line on a first-come, first-served basis for $1,000.00/helmet (limit one per an individual).
which I’m sure will make the good folks over at Tiger Droppings extremely happy.
We talked already about Coach Fickell’s promotion, and other sites have good coverage of the press conference. We expect to hear more today following the media accessible spring practice period.
We haven’t talked about the “news” that Coach Tressel forwarded the Cicero email to Jeanette businessman and Pryor mentor rather than the OSU Compliance office or Gene Smith, mostly because it’s already been said. We all have our theories/rationalizations, but it doesn’t change the fact that it makes his “confidentiality” excuse hold next to no water, and the NCAA will certainly respond accordingly. I was a bit intrigued that the media responded almost wholeheartedly with a “well, now that we know this, he has to be fired/resign” theme, mostly because this doesn’t get to be decided in the media. We’re assuming that, if this information was leaked from inside the athletic department, that the NCAA was aware of this (and has been since the University found out about it). So, while it doesn’t appear positive in any way it’s not as if it was “proof of a greater coverup”. It’s like I’ve been told- just because I don’t know something doesn’t mean that it’s important for me to know it.
So, let’s get to the flavor of the day: The “HBO “revelation” that a former recruit at Ohio State is alleging that he received cash from a booster and “sexual favors” from a co-ed while on a recruiting trip. We’ll get to the context in just a minute, but it should be noted that this occurred around the same time that the athletic department was under a full investigation, and the University was not found to have any pervasive issues with this type of behavior (“pervasive” means “more than a one or two time thing”). If true, it’s indefensible and should have been dealt with.
Regarding the “sexual favors” aspect of the story, I’m shocked to hear that a student who was visiting a University might have had “relations” with someone during their visit. That type of thing never happens when high school kids visit Universities. Sarcasm aside, unless this was coordinated or tacitly facilitated by the athletic department or the coaching staff, I’m not sure how it’s relevant to the perspective that those two entities are “lawless”. Particularly when the reporting team at HBO sports has themselves stated they had no proof to back up the claim. However, since Ohio State is the target of the month, it’s the story that everyone’s been running with.
And now, the rest of the stories…
Last summer, your humble correspondent noted that the NCAA had been particularly busy with high profile cases and situations, and wondered if there was a new mentality for the organization in terms of addressing these types of issues. Be careful what you wish for, right?
Over the past few days, we’ve seen this blow up in ways that were unimaginable in previous years. Here’s a quick summary for those of you who only rely on ESPN for your news and commentary:
- In the HBO story mentioned above, Michigan State and LSU were among the programs that were also accused of “money handshakes” for the recruit in question. Although, you probably didn’t see headlines about Michigan State.
- The story centers around the athlete’s decision to attend the University of Auburn after receiving a “book bag full of cash”.
- The HBO account also alleges that Auburn players were paid for their performance on the field; statistical excellence leading to financial compensation.
- Also last night, a former Texas A&M coach alleged that Will Lyles (remember him?) asked for $80,000 to ensure that Patrick Patterson would become an Aggie. Patterson ended up at LSU, and has some of his own problems with “remembering”.
- A relationship between Lyles and LSU should not be surprising, since he was paid this past year for recruiting services. If it’s proven that he was on visits with recruits while being paid by a University, then he assumes “booster” status and the institution may be subject to sanctions.
- Since we’re talking about Lyles, we can’t leave out Baron Flenory, who was supposed to have a 7 on 7 camp at Michigan this weekend. The Wolverines cancelled that event… and rightfully so.
- In the midst of Tresselmania, we’ve heard ad nauseum “If Dez Bryant was suspended for a year for lying to the NCAA, then Ohio State has to fire their coach.” While this logic may yet carry weight with the folks in Indianapolis, it’s time to stop acting if the former Oklahoma State star was an innocent victim of injustice by the organization. Especially in light of the revelation that he received close to $200,000 in jewelry while at TBPU, a “gift” to be paid in full once Bryant went pro.
- Ah, and Da’ U is trying to get back to the swagger… although not how they’d planned, I’m sure.
- Not really recruiting related, but Penn State also finds themselves in an incredibly unfortunate situation.
- And we haven’t even talked about the “oversigning” situation... Happy that Duron may have found a home at ‘Bama, but which of Saban’s current players are going to get the axe to fit him in?
With all of this going on, it’s certainly good to have a stalwart institution like the NCAA available to help monitor and hold athletic departments accountab… what? You say the NCAA has it’s own issues to deal with right now?
- First, there was the PBS “Frontline” expose that illuminated what we’ve been saying around here for a while- the NCAA makes a lot of (tax free) money on March Madness and other endeavors, while college athletes often struggle to make ends meet during their college careers and beyond. President Mark Emmert didn’t help his case during the presentation, and seemed to be a bit out of touch with the contradiction between the money that the organization makes and the student athletes who are at the center of these endeavors.
- Also, the AP released a survey that looks at athletic drug testing across the nation. Would you believe it… there’s not a lot of consistency between institutions!
- Meanwhile, the BCS (and friends) took a massive hit yesterday with revelations that the Fiesta Bowl had been blowing through their tax free dollars with donations to political campaigns, trips to strip clubs, golf outings, and other “festive” activities. Following the termination of President John Junker, the BCS responded by investigating the matter and holding the Fiesta’s BCS status in jeopardy of revocation.
Among the crack panel looking into the matter? An Orange Bowl committee member who accepted a free cruise as a part of his Orange Bowl duties. Playoff PAC released an evaluation of “the blind leading the blind”, which includes the revelation that (HT Wiz Of Odds):
- The Orange Bowl sponsors an annual Caribbean Cruise that the bowl describes as a “complimentary getaway” for bowl staff and college football officials that features no business meetings.
- One out of every $10 that the Sugar Bowl takes in ends up in the hands of its top three executives.
- BCS bowls use charitable funds to fly bowl executives and spouses first-class, pay private club dues and foot the bill for employees’ personal income taxes. The Orange Bowl, for example, spent $756,546 on travel in fiscal 2009 for its personnel.
- The Orange Bowl spent $331,938 on “parties” and “summer splash” in fiscal 2004, $42,281 on “golf” in fiscal 2004 and 2006, $535,764 on “gifts” in fiscal 2006 and $472,627 on “gifts” in fiscal 2008.
- The Sugar Bowl spent $201,226 on “gifts and bonuses” and $330,244 on “decorations” in fiscal 2008.
- The Orange Bowl spends over $100,000 per year on “postage and shipping” (10 times the amount that other BCS Bowls spend annually).
Yup, that’s the same Orange Bowl where Virginia Tech and Stanford lost money for the privilege to participate.
UPDATE: The Solid Verbal brings a video montage of the mayhem:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8VvDLwPvQo&w=480&h=390]
So, with all of this carnage, what’s the takeaway for college football and college sports fans? For me, there are a couple of things that stand out.
- This is going to be an interesting summer. And by “interesting”, I mean “hey, that’s a tractor trailer accident and now nuclear cannibal cows are roaming the city. That’s interesting…”. We alluded to it when the Oregon story broke, but this off season could easily be one that changes the landscape of the sport.
- Easy on the schadenfreude. It seems as if the motto for the current climate could easily be “Just wait…”, as program after program are brought into scrutiny by investigative journalism and unfortunate incidents within their athletic departments.
- Change is on the way? There continues to be pressure in the court of public opinion regarding the NCAA and “big time” college sports- the Cam Newton situation, the ongoing cries for a playoff/investigation of the BCS, the whispers of future conference expansion (remember that? Wasn’t that fun?) all continue to mount. Should federal interest turn it’s eye to the business (and tax exempt status) of athletics and higher education (like they have nothing else to do), the we could see some major developments at a structural level.
- Will the hammer fall? How will the NCAA deal with these situations? Will they have the time/staffing/resources to fully delve into all of these matters (pay for play, recruiting and street agents, institutional integrity challenges)? And when they do, will they be looking to set a new precedent/make an example of persons outside of their expectations, or will the responses be consistent with their history of dealing with these type of things? Will they find it easier to punish individuals or entire programs? We wondered this summer if the NCAA was working harder in order to maintain relevancy- will their responses reflect that?
For Ohio State fans, this last question might be the most relevant… Will the NCAA’s decisions on the current investigation be appropriate and proportional to the situation, or will the public pressure and media frenzy to “clean things ups” result in sanctions that exceed what we’ve seen other places? While I still believe that there are only minimal comparisons between the situations involving Ohio State and Tennessee (including investigation into other aspects of the athletic department at UT), Buckeye fans might be able to read the future of the program in the tea leaves of this summer’s decision about Knoxville.
Like I said… it’ll be an interesting summer.
Add The Sports Daily to your Google News Feed!
