The pro Brady collumn is sort of hilarious.
First argument: emotional and impossible to verify
Second argument: emotional and impossible verify
Third argument: Untrue. Manning had a higher YPA, better rating, better TD% in his 2004 season. His 2004 is considered statistically superior by most stat sites. In addition, Randy Moss is a better WR (when motivated) than any player in history.
Fourth argument: Hilariously untrue. He sites Manning’s comments this summer about Moore and Mudd…which were true. The organization WASN’T on the same page. Classic no nothing garbage.
Fifth argument: True, but deceiving. Manning only plays in 40 degree games on the road. Brady plays a good percentage of his at home. That makes a difference when discussing how a player plays. Beyond that, Manning’s sample size is limited to EIGHT GAMES. Hard to make any case based on 8 games.
Add The Sports Daily to your Google News Feed!
