BBS rails hard (and rightly) against the World Wide Leader today for their disparate coverage of the Roethlisberger and Harrison civil suits.
I’m not going to rehash the whole story here, but let me add a quick check list of ESPN’s guidelines for reporting on a civil suit:
- “No criminal complaint was filed”
- Allegations in a civil suit “may not prove to be true.”
- ESPN is “careful” in reporting civil suits “that impugn a person’s reputation or character.”
Hmm, how does Marv’s case stack up?
- Harrison was never charged. The police said he was not a suspect. Check. Marv is clear.
- He has been accused by a convicted murder who was found guilty of lying to the police about the incident and a man currently in jail. Pretty good chance the allegations may not prove to be true. Check. Marv is clear.
- The story has certainly hurt Harrison’s reputation and character. Check.
I agree with BBS on this point: ESPN doesn’t seem to care about the rep of a black WR as much as the reputation of a white QB. I can’t see any difference between the two cases based on the criteria that ESPN has given.
Look, I don’t care if you think Marv shot those people or not. The point is that none of us look at him the same way we did before thanks to ESPN’s over zealousness at every step of the way in covering this story. The odd thing is that this coverage seems to be in direct contrast to a standing ESPN policy. They heard the Roethlisberger story and said to themselves, “It can’t be!”. They heard the Harrison story and said, “Run with it!” The question they can’t answer is why.
Add The Sports Daily to your Google News Feed!