{"id":1173315,"date":"2020-12-15T10:02:35","date_gmt":"2020-12-15T15:02:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thesportsdaily.com\/?p=1173315"},"modified":"2020-12-15T10:02:35","modified_gmt":"2020-12-15T15:02:35","slug":"invicta-fc-performance-based-fighter-rankings-feather-bantamweight-dec-15-20-fox11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thesportsdaily.com\/news\/invicta-fc-performance-based-fighter-rankings-feather-bantamweight-dec-15-20-fox11\/","title":{"rendered":"Invicta FC Performance Based Fighter Rankings: Feather\/Bantamweight: Dec 15\/20"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There is constant debate about fighter rankings, which are normally based on voting from a panel of journalists. \u00a0Such is the case with something as subjective as voting – it’s totally based on voter’s opinion, and biases are bound to seep through, whether intentional or no. \u00a0So to try to put a fresh, objective, data-driven spin on rankings, The MMA Manifesto has come up with a performance based ranking system, solely based on how a fighter has performed in the cage, this time for Invicta FC. \u00a0We’ll roll out a new weight class every Tuesday.\u00a0Next up: Feathweights & Bantamweights.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n *stipulations: 1) any fighter currently suspended or 2) inactive for at least 12 months (without an upcoming fight scheduled) are excluded from the rankings <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Check back next Tuesday for our flyweight rankings\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n <\/strong>Flyweights<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There is constant debate about fighter rankings, which are normally based on voting from a panel of journalists. \u00a0Such…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":853335,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[543583741],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n Stats<\/strong><\/td>\n Last<\/strong><\/td>\n <\/td>\n Total<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Rank<\/strong><\/td>\n Rank<\/strong><\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n Chelsea Chandler<\/td>\n 56<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n Pam Sorenson<\/td>\n 53<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n Taneisha Tennant<\/td>\n 35.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n Kaitlin Young<\/td>\n 30.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n Hope Chase<\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n Kayla Harrison<\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n Kelly Clayton<\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 8<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n Raquel Canuto<\/td>\n 24.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 9<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n Lisa Verzosa<\/td>\n 20.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 10<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n Courtney King<\/td>\n 18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 11<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n Taylor Guardado<\/td>\n 12.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 12<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n Erin Harpe<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 12<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n Mitzi Merry<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 12<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n Monica Franco<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 15<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n Julia Ottolino<\/td>\n 4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 15<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n Serena de Jesus<\/td>\n 4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 17<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n Brittney Victoria<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 17<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n Latoya Walker<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 19<\/td>\n 18<\/td>\n Kerri Kenneson<\/td>\n 3.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 20<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n Brittney Cloudy<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 20<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n Florina Moeller<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 20<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n Morgan Hickam<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 20<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n Tina Pettigrew<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\nInvicta Performance Ranking<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nStrawweights<\/a>
\nAtomweights<\/a>
\n<\/strong>Pound for Pound<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n